Este post proviene de esta fuente de noticias
The Securities and Exchange Commission awarded more than $500,000 to a whistleblower who raised concerns internally before submitting a tip to the Commission. The whistleblower’s information and assistance allowed the Commission and another agency to quickly file actions, shutting down an ongoing fraudulent scheme.
The whistleblower’s information prompted an internal investigation by the company, which then reported to an outside agency, which in turn provided the information to the SEC. Separately, the whistleblower also reported to the SEC within 120 days of reporting the violations internally to the company. Under the “safe harbor” provision of the SEC’s whistleblower rules, the SEC treats the whistleblower’s information as though it had been submitted to the SEC at the same time it was internally reported as long as the whistleblower also reports the information to the SEC within 120 days of the internal report.
“With this award, the Commission has awarded 40 individuals this fiscal year, surpassing last year’s record of 39 individual awards,” said Jane Norberg, Chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower. “The Commission has awarded whistleblowers nearly $200 million in the first half of FY21 alone.”
The SEC has now awarded approximately $760 million to 145 individuals since issuing its first award in 2012. All payments are made out of an investor protection fund established by Congress that is financed entirely through monetary sanctions paid to the SEC by securities law violators. No money has been taken or withheld from harmed investors to pay whistleblower awards. Whistleblowers may be eligible for an award when they voluntarily provide the SEC with original, timely, and credible information that leads to a successful enforcement action. Whistleblower awards can range from 10-30% of the money collected when the monetary sanctions exceed $1 million.
- Joint Venture tecnológica en España: claves legales para compartir IP y beneficios
- Cómo las brechas de datos afectan a marcas como Mango y a sus clientes
- Marketing digital y protección de datos en España: errores comunes
- Meta es demandada por el uso indebido de datos biométricos
- Comunicación responsable SII, ¿cuándo comienza el plazo?
- Decisiones automatizadas y sesgos algorítmicos: responsabilidad legal de las empresas en España
- Privacidad digital: ¿es posible en un mundo hiperconectado?
- Aceptación de cookies, cookie wall y pago como alternativa: qué permite la AEPD
- ¿Cómo sé que mi empresa es un sujeto obligado de la Ley 10/2010?
- Protección de los menores en Internet: claves para garantizar sus derechos
- Contratos de outsourcing tecnológico: puntos críticos legales en España
- Transferencias internacionales de datos personales: retos y aspectos clave
- Fuerza mayor en contratos SaaS: cómo proteger tu empresa ante caídas y ciberataques
- Acceso a instalaciones mediante control biométrico: identificación vs autenticación
- Pacto de socios en startups tecnológicas: manual de supervivencia para fundadores