Este post proviene de esta fuente de noticias
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s securities markets regulator, has today made available the results of the annual transparency calculations for non-equity instruments, which will apply from 1 June 2021. These calculations include the liquidity assessment and the determination of the pre- and post-trade size specific to the instruments and large in scale thresholds.
The results for the liquid sub-classes have been published in Excel format in the Annual transparency calculations for non-equity instruments register. The file does not contain the results for a number of asset-classes and sub-classes given the impossibility to correctly apply the segmentation criteria, as defined in Annex III of RTS 2 due to data quality problems or the absence of reporting standards for the applicable reference data. As a result, the transparency calculations for, among others, credit derivatives and options, futures and FRAs (forward rate agreements) on interest rates are not available.
ESMA will provide the annual transparency calculations for non-equity instruments at instrument (ISIN) basis, both liquid and illiquid ones, as of 30 April 2021. This information will be made available through the Financial Instruments Transparency System (FITRS) both by publishing XML files (here) and through the Register web interface (here).
As communicated in the Public Statement on the Use of UK data in ESMA databases and performance of MiFID II calculations following the end of the UK transition period on 31 December 2020, the UK data reported before Brexit is used to perform the calculations.
Recommendations for market participants:
- Consult the guidance provided in Q&A 20 of Section 4 Non-equity transparency of the Questions and Answers on MiFID II and MiFIR transparency topics for the application of the annual transparency calculations for non-equity instruments (in particular, in relation to the order of application of the annual transparency calculations at ISIN level vs. at sub-class level); and
- Review the FIRDS Transparency System downloading instructions document to avoid any misinterpretation of the results.
- Joint Venture tecnológica en España: claves legales para compartir IP y beneficios
- Cómo las brechas de datos afectan a marcas como Mango y a sus clientes
- Marketing digital y protección de datos en España: errores comunes
- Meta es demandada por el uso indebido de datos biométricos
- Comunicación responsable SII, ¿cuándo comienza el plazo?
- Decisiones automatizadas y sesgos algorítmicos: responsabilidad legal de las empresas en España
- Privacidad digital: ¿es posible en un mundo hiperconectado?
- Aceptación de cookies, cookie wall y pago como alternativa: qué permite la AEPD
- ¿Cómo sé que mi empresa es un sujeto obligado de la Ley 10/2010?
- Protección de los menores en Internet: claves para garantizar sus derechos
- Contratos de outsourcing tecnológico: puntos críticos legales en España
- Transferencias internacionales de datos personales: retos y aspectos clave
- Fuerza mayor en contratos SaaS: cómo proteger tu empresa ante caídas y ciberataques
- Acceso a instalaciones mediante control biométrico: identificación vs autenticación
- Pacto de socios en startups tecnológicas: manual de supervivencia para fundadores
