This publication have been previously published in this site.
The Albanian authorities should, without any further delay, determine whether the ruling party obtained Tirana voters’ personal data from government registries, Transparency International said today. The Special Prosecution Against Corruption and Organised Crime (SPAK) must also urgently investigate whether the incumbent party abused state resources for securing a win during Sunday’s parliamentary election.
On 11 April, an Albanian media portal published a database containing personal data and private information of 910,000 individuals, allegedly maintained by the country’s ruling Socialist Party. It was revealed – and since then confirmed – that ‘patrons’ were assigned to voters who tracked their political preferences. Additional comments, recorded by the patrons, reportedly detail their interactions with citizens, with some instances amounting to possible voter intimidation.
Daniel Eriksson, Chief Executive Officer of Transparency International Secretariat, said: “In recent years, we have seen the alarming trend of harnessing personal data to influence election outcomes. If proven, the allegations that Albania’s ruling party maintained an illegally obtained database with personal and private information on 910,000 citizens would constitute not only a data breach, but also a breach of public trust. An impartial inquiry would have been able to very quickly determine whether the party obtained citizens’ personal data from government sources.”
The leaked database reportedly contains names of 9,000 ‘patrons’, many of whom journalists have identified as public sector employees, police officers and even army personnel.
Prime Minister Edi Rama confirmed that the ‘patron’ system is in place but claimed that citizens’ data was collected through door-to-door meetings. According to Albania’s Ombudsperson, the collection and processing of sensitive information seen in the database is unlawful, in the first place.
“It is incomprehensible that government officials have been downplaying the graveness of these revelations,” added Eriksson. “The failure to adequately investigate and sanction wrongdoing will cast the shadow over the fairness of the upcoming election. We call on the international observers to take note of these issues as part of their assessments.”
- España desciende en el Índice de Percepción de la Corrupción 2024
- Requisitos de Compliance en Portugal: todo lo que las empresas españolas deben saber
- “Lista Stop Publicidad”, un nuevo sistema de exclusión publicitaria reconocido por la AEPD
- Las pruebas de integridad como herramienta clave en la mitigación de riesgos
- Reglamento Delegado sobre el acceso a los datos previsto en la Ley de Servicios Digitales
- Las principales recomendaciones sobre la pseudonimización por el CEPD
- Sanciones a altos ejecutivos de Wells Fargo por el escándalo de las cuentas falsas
- Modernización de la Justicia a través de la Ley Orgánica de Eficiencia Organizativa
- Dani Olmo y el debate legal sobre las celebraciones de gol como marcas
- Multa a la Comisión Europea por transferencia ilícita de datos personales
- BRAVA: La Herramienta de IA de la CNMC para Detectar Prácticas Anticompetitivas
- McKinsey y los $650 millones: lecciones de la crisis de opioides
- Protección del Informante en la Comunidad de Madrid: un paso hacia la transparencia
- Sistema de Gestión de Conflictos de Interés según la ISO 37009
- Cómo una empresa de prevención puede mejorar la gestión de riesgos