This publication have been previously published in this site.
The Albanian authorities should, without any further delay, determine whether the ruling party obtained Tirana voters’ personal data from government registries, Transparency International said today. The Special Prosecution Against Corruption and Organised Crime (SPAK) must also urgently investigate whether the incumbent party abused state resources for securing a win during Sunday’s parliamentary election.
On 11 April, an Albanian media portal published a database containing personal data and private information of 910,000 individuals, allegedly maintained by the country’s ruling Socialist Party. It was revealed – and since then confirmed – that ‘patrons’ were assigned to voters who tracked their political preferences. Additional comments, recorded by the patrons, reportedly detail their interactions with citizens, with some instances amounting to possible voter intimidation.
Daniel Eriksson, Chief Executive Officer of Transparency International Secretariat, said: “In recent years, we have seen the alarming trend of harnessing personal data to influence election outcomes. If proven, the allegations that Albania’s ruling party maintained an illegally obtained database with personal and private information on 910,000 citizens would constitute not only a data breach, but also a breach of public trust. An impartial inquiry would have been able to very quickly determine whether the party obtained citizens’ personal data from government sources.”
The leaked database reportedly contains names of 9,000 ‘patrons’, many of whom journalists have identified as public sector employees, police officers and even army personnel.
Prime Minister Edi Rama confirmed that the ‘patron’ system is in place but claimed that citizens’ data was collected through door-to-door meetings. According to Albania’s Ombudsperson, the collection and processing of sensitive information seen in the database is unlawful, in the first place.
“It is incomprehensible that government officials have been downplaying the graveness of these revelations,” added Eriksson. “The failure to adequately investigate and sanction wrongdoing will cast the shadow over the fairness of the upcoming election. We call on the international observers to take note of these issues as part of their assessments.”
- La APDCAT avala la instalación de cámaras de videovigilancia en los taxis
- Novedades respecto a las directrices de verificación de edad
- Multa de 10.000 euros de la AEPD por incumplimiento del RGPD
- Nuevo Plan de acción en materia de Responsabilidad Social de la AEPD
- Nuevas obligaciones laborales para empresas: medidas para la igualdad LGTBI
- La AEPD participa en una acción europea para analizar la aplicación del derecho de acceso
- ENISA detalla las últimas novedades sobre el ciberseguro
- Actualización en las Normas ISO 27001, ISO 37001 e ISO 37301
- Nueva campaña del INCIBE trata de frenar el acceso de menores a contenidos perjudiciales en Internet
- La Comisión Europea adopta el primer régimen europeo de certificación de ciberseguridad
- El TS impone límites en la inclusión de datos personales en los ficheros públicos de riesgos de crédito
- Análisis del Índice de Percepción de la Corrupción de 2023
- Balance anual de la AEPD: más de 16 millones de euros en multas
- Resultados de la acción europea que ha analizado la designación y situación de los delegados de protección de datos
- Autoridades independientes de protección al informante en España a enero de 2024