Este post proviene de esta fuente de noticias
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s securities markets regulator, has today published its annual peer review report on the supervision of EU Central Counterparties (CCPs) by National Competent Authorities (NCAs). The Peer Review measured the effectiveness of NCA supervisory practices in assessing CCP compliance with EMIR’s requirements on liquidity stress testing.
Overall, the review found that NCAs’ supervisory activities on CCPs’ liquidity stress testing are satisfactory. However, the peer review showed that the assessment of some areas of liquidity stress testing was not always performed or being evidenced sufficiently. In particular, NCAs should make that the settlement of obligations of defaulting clearing members are reflected in full in the liquidity stress testing framework.
The report also identifies several best practices and considerations to further enhance supervisory convergence with respect to CCPs’ liquidity stress testing.
On the functioning of CCP colleges, the review of colleges’ activities during the reporting period remains overall positive.
Next steps
ESMA will follow up on the report’s findings to identify, where relevant, the most appropriate tools to further enhance supervisory convergence.
Background
The peer reviews under EMIR assess the overall functioning of CCP colleges and provide an in-depth analysis of supervisory activities by NCAs on CCPs in relation to EMIR’s requirements. The reviews also assess if NCAs are following the relevant guidelines and opinions agreed by ESMA and identifies best practices.
The CCP Supervisory Committee is mandated to conduct, at least annually, a peer review analysis of the supervisory activities of all NCAs in relation to the authorisation and the supervision of CCPs in accordance with Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 (ESMA Regulation).
- Transferencias internacionales de datos personales: retos y aspectos clave
- Fuerza mayor en contratos SaaS: cómo proteger tu empresa ante caídas y ciberataques
- Acceso a instalaciones mediante control biométrico: identificación vs autenticación
- Pacto de socios en startups tecnológicas: manual de supervivencia para fundadores
- Autoridad Independiente de Protección al Informante (AIPI) en España: qué es y cómo funciona
- El derecho al olvido en el caso de Cecilia Sopeña
- Drones y protección de datos: claves de la guía de la AEPD
- Protección de marcas renombradas en el sector tecnológico: el “efecto extraclase”
- El mal uso de la Inteligencia Artificial en la empresa: consecuencias técnicas, legales y comerciales
- Protección de datos en cámaras de garaje: lo que debes saber antes de instalarlas
- Protección de datos en mirillas electrónicas: un caso resuelto por el Supremo
- Protección de datos en el caso Ter Stegen y el FC Barcelona
- Carteles en comunidades de propietarios y derecho al honor: sentencia del Supremo 1186/2024
- Los principios o «reglas de oro» de la protección de datos
- La AEPD recuerda que ya puede actuar ante sistemas de IA