Este post proviene de esta fuente de noticias
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced an award of over $50 million to joint whistleblowers whose information alerted SEC staff to violations that involved highly complex transactions and would have been difficult to detect without their information.
The joint whistleblowers provided exemplary assistance to the SEC staff during the investigation, including meeting with staff numerous times and providing voluminous detailed documents. The information provided by these individuals resulted in the return of tens of millions of dollars to harmed investors.
“Today’s award is the second largest in the history of the program, reflecting the tremendous contribution of these joint whistleblowers to our ability to recover funds for harmed investors,” said Jane Norberg, Chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower. “The SEC has now awarded over a quarter of a billion dollars to whistleblowers in the first seven months of this fiscal year alone, demonstrating the tremendous value of whistleblowers to our enforcement program.”
The SEC has now awarded approximately $812 million to 151 individuals since issuing its first award in 2012. All payments are made out of an investor protection fund established by Congress that is financed entirely through monetary sanctions paid to the SEC by securities law violators. No money has been taken or withheld from harmed investors to pay whistleblower awards. Whistleblowers may be eligible for an award when they voluntarily provide the SEC with original, timely, and credible information that leads to a successful enforcement action. Whistleblower awards can range from 10 percent to 30 percent of the money collected when the monetary sanctions exceed $1 million.
As set forth in the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC protects the confidentiality of whistleblowers and does not disclose any information that could reveal a whistleblower’s identity.
- Reflexión sobre el incidente de Amazon Web Services
- Joint Venture tecnológica en España: claves legales para compartir IP y beneficios
- Cómo las brechas de datos afectan a marcas como Mango y a sus clientes
- Marketing digital y protección de datos en España: errores comunes
- Meta es demandada por el uso indebido de datos biométricos
- Comunicación responsable SII, ¿cuándo comienza el plazo?
- Decisiones automatizadas y sesgos algorítmicos: responsabilidad legal de las empresas en España
- Privacidad digital: ¿es posible en un mundo hiperconectado?
- Aceptación de cookies, cookie wall y pago como alternativa: qué permite la AEPD
- ¿Cómo sé que mi empresa es un sujeto obligado de la Ley 10/2010?
- Protección de los menores en Internet: claves para garantizar sus derechos
- Contratos de outsourcing tecnológico: puntos críticos legales en España
- Transferencias internacionales de datos personales: retos y aspectos clave
- Fuerza mayor en contratos SaaS: cómo proteger tu empresa ante caídas y ciberataques
- Acceso a instalaciones mediante control biométrico: identificación vs autenticación